Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166

Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference in /var/www/vhosts/pmandr.com/httpdocs/includes/domit/xml_domit_nodemaps.php on line 166
Healthcare Headlines
BMC Molecular Biology - Latest Articles
  • Standardized collection of MNase-seq experiments enables unbiased dataset comparisons
    Background: The organization of eukaryotic DNA into chromatin has a strong influence on the accessibility and regulation of genetic information. The locations and occupancies of a principle component of chromatin, nucleosomes, are typically assayed through use of enzymatic digestion with micrococcal nuclease (MNase). MNase is an endo-exo nuclease that preferentially digests naked DNA and the DNA in linkers between nucleosomes, thus enriching for nucleosome-associated DNA. To determine nucleosome organization genome-wide, DNA remaining from MNase digestion is sequenced using high-throughput sequencing technologies (MNase-seq). Unfortunately, the results of MNase-seq can vary dramatically due to technical differences and this confounds comparisons between MNase-seq experiments, such as examining condition-dependent chromatin organizations. Results: In this study we use MNase digestion simulations to demonstrate how MNase-seq signals can vary for different nucleosome configuration when experiments are performed with different extents of MNase digestion. Signal variation in these simulations reveals an important DNA sampling bias that results from a neighborhood effect of MNase digestion techniques. The presence of this neighborhood effect ultimately confounds comparisons between different MNase-seq experiments. To address this issue we present a standardized chromatin preparation which controls for technical variance between MNase-based chromatin preparations and enables the collection of similarly sampled (matched) chromatin populations. Standardized preparation of chromatin includes a normalization step for DNA input into MNase digestions and close matching of the extent of digestion between each chromatin preparation using gel densitometry analysis. Conclusions: We validated our method by comparing the experiment-to-experiment variation between biological replicates of chromatin preparations from S. cereivisae. Results from our matched preparation consistently produce MNase-seq datasets that are more closely correlated than other unstandardized approaches. Additionally, we validated the ability of our approach at enabling accurate downstream comparisons of chromatin structures, by comparing the specificity of detecting Tup1-dependent chromatin remodeling events in comparisons between matched and un-matched wild-type and tup1 MNase-seq datasets. Our matched MNase-seq datasets demonstrated a significant reduction in non-specific (technical) differences between experiments and were able to maximize the detection of biologically-relevant (Tup1-dependent) changes in chromatin structure.

  • Correction: LIM kinase 1 - dependent cofilin 1 pathway and actin dynamics mediate nuclear retinoid receptor function in T lymphocytes
    Initially Dr Angelica Aguilera-Gutierrez was not included in the authors list of an article published in BMC Molecular Biology (2011, 12:41) by Ishaq et al [1]. All the authors agree that Dr Aguilera-Gutierrez meets the criteria for authorship, and should be considered an author of the article [1].

  • Related bifunctional restriction endonuclease-methyltransferase triplets: TspDTI, Tth111II/TthHB27I and TsoI with distinct specificities
    Background: We previously defined a family of restriction endonucleases (REases) from Thermus sp., which share common biochemical and biophysical features, such as the fusion of both the nuclease and methyltransferase (MTase) activities in a single polypeptide, cleavage at a distance from the recognition site, large molecular size, modulation of activity by S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), and incomplete cleavage of the substrate DNA. Members include related thermophilic REases with five distinct specificities: TspGWI, TaqII, Tth111II/TthHB27I, TspDTI and TsoI. Results: TspDTI, TsoI and isoschizomers Tth111II/TthHB27I recognize different, but related sequences: 5' -ATGAA-3' , 5' -TARCCA-3' and 5' -CAARCA-3' respectively. Their amino acid sequences are similar, which is unusual among REases of different specificity. To gain insight into this group of REases, TspDTI, the prototype member of the Thermus sp. enzyme family, was cloned and characterized using a recently developed method for partially cleaving REases. Conclusions: TspDTI, TsoI and isoschizomers Tth111II/TthHB27I are closely related bifunctional enzymes.They comprise a tandem arrangement of Type I-like domains, like other Type IIC enzymes (those with a fusion of a REase and MTase domains), e.g. TspGWI, TaqII and MmeI, but their sequences are only remotely similar to these previously characterized enzymes. The characterization of TspDTI, a prototype member of this group, extends our understanding of sequence-function relationships among multifunctional restriction-modification enzymes.

  • High recovery of cell-free methylated DNA based on a rapid bisulfite-treatment protocol
    Background: Detection of cell-free methylated DNA in plasma is a promising tool for tumour diagnosis and monitoring. Due to the very low amounts of cell-free DNA in plasma, analytical sensitivity is of utmost importance. The vast majority of currently available methods for analysing DNA methylation are based on bisulfite-mediated deamination of cytosine. Cytosine is rapidly converted to uracil during bisulfite treatment, whereas 5-methylcytosine is only slowly converted. Hence, bisulfite treatment converts an epigenetic modification into a difference in sequence, amenable to analysis either by sequencing or PCR based methods. However, the recovery of bisulfite-converted DNA is very poor. Results: Here we introduce an alternative method for the crucial steps of bisulfite treatment with high recovery. The method is based on an accelerated deamination step and alkaline desulfonation in combination with magnetic silica purification of DNA, allowing preparation of deaminated DNA from patient samples in less than 2 hours. Conclusions: The method presented here allows low levels of DNA to be easily and reliably analysed, a prerequisite for the clinical usefulness of cell-free methylated DNA detection in plasma.

  • The leukemia associated nuclear corepressor ETO homologue genes MTG16 and MTGR1 are regulated differently in hematopoietic cells
    Background: MTG16, MTGR1 and ETO are nuclear transcriptional corepressors of the human ETO protein family. MTG16 is implicated in hematopoietic development and in controlling erythropoiesis/megakaryopoiesis. Furthermore, ETO homologue genes are 3' participants in leukemia fusions generated by chromosomal translocations responsible of hematopoietic dysregulation. We tried to identify structural and functional promoter elements of MTG16 and MTGR1 genes in order to find associations between their regulation and hematopoiesis. Results: 5' deletion examinations and luciferase reporter gene studies indicated that a 492 bp sequence upstream of the transcription start site is essential for transcriptional activity by the MTG16 promoter. The TATA- and CCAAT-less promoter with a GC box close to the start site showed strong reporter activity when examined in erythroid/megakaryocytic cells. Mutation of an evolutionary conserved GATA 301 consensus binding site repressed promoter function. Furthermore, results from in vitro antibody-enhanced electrophoretic mobility shift assay and in vivo chromatin immunoprecipitation indicated binding of GATA-1 to the GATA 301 site. A role of GATA-1 was also supported by transfection of small interfering RNA, which diminished MTG16 expression. Furthermore, expression of the transcription factor HERP2, which represses GATA-1, produced strong inhibition of the MTG16 promoter reporter consistent with a role of GATA-1 in transcriptional activation. The TATA-less and CCAAT-less MTGR1 promoter retained most of the transcriptional activity within a 308 to 207 bp region with a GC-box-rich sequence containing multiple SP1 binding sites reminiscent of a housekeeping gene with constitutive expression. However, mutations of individual SP1 binding sites did not repress promoter function; multiple active SP1 binding sites may be required to safeguard constitutive MTGR1 transcriptional activity. The observed repression of MTG16/MTGR1 promoters by the leukemia associated AML1-ETO fusion gene may have a role in hematopoietic dysfunction of leukemia. Conclusions: An evolutionary conserved GATA binding site is critical in transcriptional regulation of the MTG16 promoter. In contrast, the MTGR1 gene depends on a GC-box-rich sequence for transcriptional regulation and possible ubiquitous expression. Our results demonstrate that the ETO homologue promoters are regulated differently consistent with hematopoietic cell-type-specific expression and function.

  • Control of progesterone receptor transcriptional synergy by SUMOylation and deSUMOylation
    Background: Covalent modification of nuclear receptors by the Small Ubiquitin-like Modifier (SUMO) is dynamically regulated by competing conjugation/deconjugation steps that modulate their overall transcriptional activity. SUMO conjugation of progesterone receptors (PRs) at the N-terminal lysine (K) 388 residue of PR-B is hormone-dependent and suppresses PR-dependent transcription. Mutation of the SUMOylation motif promotes transcriptional synergy. Results: The present studies address mechanisms underlying this transcriptional synergy by using SUMOylation deficient PR mutants and PR specifically deSUMOylated by Sentrin-specific proteases (SENPs). We show that deSUMOylation of a small pool of receptors by catalytically competent SENPs globally modulates the cooperativity-driven transcriptional synergy between PR observed on exogenous promoters containing at least two progesterone-response elements (PRE2). This occurs in part by raising PR sensitivity to ligands. The C-terminal ligand binding domain of PR is required for the transcriptional stimulatory effects of N-terminal deSUMOylation, but neither a functional PR dimerization interface, nor a DNA binding domain exhibiting PR specificity, are required. Conclusion: We conclude that direct and reversible SUMOylation of a minor PR protein subpopulation tightly controls the overall transcriptional activity of the receptors at complex synthetic promoters. Transcriptional synergism controlled by SENP-dependent PR deSUMOylation is dissociable from MAPK-catalyzed receptor phosphorylation, from SRC-1 coactivation and from recruitment of histone deacetylases to promoters. This will provide more information for targeting PR as a part of hormonal therapy of breast cancer. Taken together, these data demonstrate that the SUMOylation/deSUMOylation pathway is an interesting target for therapeutic treatment of breast cancer.

  • Novel polysome messages and changes in translational activity appear after induction of adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 cells
    Background: Control of translation allows for rapid adaptation of the cell to stimuli, rather than the slower transcriptional control. We presume that translational control is an essential process in the control of adipogenesis, especially in the first hours after hormonal stimulation. 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were cultured to confluency and adipogenesis was induced by standard protocols using a hormonal cocktail. Cells were harvested before and 6 hours after hormonal induction. mRNAs attached to ribosomes (polysomal mRNAs) were separated from unbound mRNAs by velocity sedimentation. Pools of polysomal and unbound mRNA fractions were analyzed by microarray analysis. Changes in relative abundance in unbound and polysomal mRNA pools were calculated to detect putative changes in translational activity. Changes of expression levels of selected genes were verified by qPCR and Western blotting. Results: We identified 43 genes that shifted towards the polysomal fraction (up-regulated) and 2 genes that shifted towards free mRNA fraction (down-regulated). Interestingly, we found Ghrelin to be down-regulated. Up-regulated genes comprise factors that are nucleic acid binding (eIF4B, HSF1, IRF6, MYC, POLR2a, RPL18, RPL27a, RPL6, RPL7a, RPS18, RPSa, TSC22d3), form part of ribosomes (RPL18, RPL27a, RPL6, RPL7a, RPS18, RPSa), act on the regulation of translation (eIF4B) or transcription (HSF1, IRF6, MYC, TSC22d3). Others act as chaperones (BAG3, HSPA8, HSP90ab1) or in other metabolic or signals transducing processes. Conclusions: We conclude that a moderate reorganisation of the functionality of the ribosomal machinery and translational activity are very important steps for growth and gene expression control in the initial phase of adipogenesis.

  • EGF activates TTP expression by activation of ELK-1 and EGR-1 transcription factors
    Background: Tristetraprolin (TTP) is a key mediator of processes such as inflammation resolution, the inhibition of autoimmunity and in cancer. It carries out this role by the binding and degradation of mRNA transcripts, thereby decreasing their half-life. Transcripts modulated by TTP encode proteins such as cytokines, pro-inflammatory agents and immediate-early response proteins. TTP can also modulate neoplastic phenotypes in many cancers. TTP is induced and functionally regulated by a spectrum of both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, mitogens and drugs in a MAPK-dependent manner. So far the contribution of p38 MAPK to the regulation of TTP expression and function has been best described. Results: Our results demonstrate the induction of the gene coding TTP (ZFP36) by EGF through the ERK1/2-dependent pathway and implicates the transcription factor ELK-1 in this process. We show that ELK-1 regulates ZFP36 expression by two mechanisms: by binding the ZFP36 promoter directly through ETS-binding site (+ 883 to +905 bp) and by inducing expression of EGR-1, which in turn increases ZFP36 expression through sequences located between -111 and -103 bp. Conclusions: EGF activates TTP expression via ELK-1 and EGR-1 transcription factors.

  • Protein kinase CK2 localizes to sites of DNA double-strand break regulating the cellular response to DNA damage
    Background: The DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) is a nuclear complex composed of a large catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) and a heterodimeric DNA-targeting subunit Ku. DNA-PK is a major component of the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair mechanism, which is activated in the presence of DNA double-strand breaks induced by ionizing radiation, reactive oxygen species and radiomimetic drugs. We have recently reported that down-regulation of protein kinase CK2 by siRNA interference results in enhanced cell death specifically in DNA-PKcs-proficient human glioblastoma cells, and this event is accompanied by decreased autophosphorylation of DNA-PKcs at S2056 and delayed repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Results: In the present study, we show that CK2 co-localizes with phosphorylated histone H2AX to sites of DNA damage and while CK2 gene knockdown is associated with delayed DNA damage repair, its overexpression accelerates this process. We report for the first time evidence that lack of CK2 destabilizes the interaction of DNA-PKcs with DNA and with Ku80 at sites of genetic lesions. Furthermore, we show that CK2 regulates the phosphorylation levels of DNA-PKcs only in response to direct induction of DNA double-strand breaks. Conclusions: Taken together, these results strongly indicate that CK2 plays a prominent role in NHEJ by facilitating and/or stabilizing the binding of DNA-PKcs and, possibly other repair proteins, to the DNA ends contributing to efficient DNA damage repair in mammalian cells.

  • An evaluation of oligonucleotide-based therapeutic strategies for polyQ diseases
    Background: RNA interference (RNAi) and antisense strategies provide experimental therapeutic agents for numerous diseases, including polyglutamine (polyQ) disorders caused by CAG repeat expansion. We compared the potential of different oligonucleotide-based strategies for silencing the genes responsible for several polyQ diseases, including Huntington's disease and two spinocerebellar ataxias, type 1 and type 3. The strategies included nonallele-selective gene silencing, gene replacement, allele-selective SNP targeting and CAG repeat targeting. Results: Using the patient-derived cell culture models of polyQ diseases, we tested various siRNAs, and antisense reagents and assessed their silencing efficiency and allele selectivity. We showed considerable allele discrimination by several SNP targeting siRNAs based on a weak G-G or G-U pairing with normal allele and strong G-C pairing with mutant allele at the site of RISC-induced cleavage. Among the CAG repeat targeting reagents the strongest allele discrimination is achieved by miRNA-like functioning reagents that bind to their targets and inhibit their translation without substantial target cleavage. Also, morpholino analog performs well in mutant and normal allele discrimination but its efficient delivery to cells at low effective concentration still remains a challenge. Conclusions: Using three cellular models of polyQ diseases and the same experimental setup we directly compared the performance of different oligonucleotide-based treatment strategies that are currently under development. Based on the results obtained by us and others we discussed the advantages and drawbacks of these strategies considering them from several different perspectives. The strategy aimed at nonallele-selective inhibiting of causative gene expression by targeting specific sequence of the implicated gene is the easiest to implement but relevant benefits are still uncertain. The gene replacement strategy that combines the nonallele-selective gene silencing with the expression of the exogenous normal allele is a logical extension of the former and it deserves to be explored further. Both allele-selective RNAi approaches challenge cellular RNA interference machinery to show its ability to discriminate between similar sequences differing in either single base substitutions or repeated sequence length. Although both approaches perform well in allele discrimination most of our efforts are focused on repeat targeting due to its potentially higher universality.


Drug Rehab
Our other Physiatry Related Sites by PM&R Resources R. Wilkerson