| Fired Via E-Mail, And Other Tales Of Poor Exits |
|
|
|
For more on the anti-intellectual nature of the military in general, read these provocative articles, published, not by a liberal rag, but by the U.S. Army War College and Army Magazine (a publication of the AUSA) http://www.carlisle.army.mil/USAWC/P...r/mastroia.htm Occupations, Cultures, and Leadership in the Army and Air Force by (Reserve LtCol) GEORGE R. MASTROIANNI Quote: "There is an absolutist and anti-intellectual strain in Air Force culture (as many have observed in military culture more generally) that resonates with a view of the world as simple and clear. Confidence in the intellectual superiority of the Air Force over the other services coexists with what sometimes appears to be contempt for the rough-and-tumble of open intellectual discourse. The paradox of Air Force culture is that it can be decidedly anti-intellectual—a circumstance perhaps not uncommon in authoritarian cultures such as the military—but nevertheless convinced of its intellectual superiority. This tendency is perhaps stronger in the Air Force than in the other services. These aspects of global Air Force culture also affect organizational forms and penetrate the thinking of the rank and file, implicitly modeling a more hierarchical, executive, personal model of decisionmaking that shapes the culture of leadership in the Air Force. The responsibility of the Air Force for controlling a component of the American strategic nuclear deterrent may also have led to broad institutional reliance on organizational models characterized by concentration and elevation of decisionmaking power in highly centralized structures." AND http://www.ausa.org/webpub/DeptArmyM...id/CCRN-6CCS4R The Uniformed Intellectual and His Place in American Arms: Part I by COL. LLOYD J. MATTHEWS, USA Ret. Quote: In 1890, U.S. Navy Captain Alfred Thayer Mahan published The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660-1783, the most influential book ever written by a serving officer with the arguable exception of Clausewitz’s On War. For this feat, his endorsing officer, Rear Adm. Franis Ramsay, rewarded him on his fitness report with the following glowing encomium: "It is not the busness of a Naval officer to write books." It is precisely this sort of attitude on the part of the bosses of military intellectuals that has led such thinkers as H. G. Wells to claim that "the professional military mind is by necessity an inferior and unimaginative mind; no man of high intellectual quality would willingly imprison his gifts in such a calling." More amusing than Capt. Mahan’s poor fitness report but no less tragic in its import is this lament from a Navy officer passed over for promotion: "I cannot understand why I wasn’t selected: I’ve never run a ship aground; I’ve never insulted a senior officer; and I’ve never contributed [an article] to the Institute’s Proceedings." Of note, both articles criticize the Army as well as its sister services. General Colin Powell asserted in his Powell Doctrine (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powell_Doctrine) that the U.S. military needs a plausible exit strategy before committing blood and treasure to an operation. What is your exit strategy from military medicine? Hint: the best exit strategy, in warfare and in life, is not to enter a bad situation in the first place. -- Written by:R. Carlton Jones, M.D. ex-LtCol, USAF, MC ex-Medical Director of Anesthesia, Travis AFB, CA ex-Assistant Chief Anesthesiologist, Andrews AFB, MD ex-Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology, USUHS Harvard '85, USUHS '90, WHMC residency 1994 Board-Certified Anesthesiologist since 1995 Patriotic American Civilian Veteran since 1 July 2005 http://www.medicalcorpse.com Orignally posted to Student Doctor Network Forums *Source:author Amy Joyce Washington Post Staff Writer Sunday, September 10, 2006; Page F01 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...090900103.html |
|||||
| < Previous | Next > |
|---|
Management experts agree that there is no great way to fire someone.